http://www.ticalc.org/archives/ files/authors/index.html#2

Hail to the king, baby.

I am the king. That's why you all say litc!

gfy!!!!

Shame on you, no profile.

Have you noticed that everyone who tries to be an opponent to everyone else by saying the same thing over and over again don't allow their profile to be viewed by others?

Examples:
lsvllhs15
CalcDrone

Cause he's a !a!g!t! as you like to say. w00t! And there is a song by AEROSMITH called Shame On You, but there is no faggot part.

You downloaded all of them 50 times? Well, you must be REALLY proud then...

What are you talking about??

3238 downloads divided by 50 gives you 64.76 per file... so I have no idea what you mean.

I just said a number, because I supposed that there might be some real downloads, too. It seemed that every single file exceeds at least 50 downloads - I didn't check them all though -, so I chose this number.

Do you get your account deleted for downloading your own files?

Why are you accusing him of downloading his own files? Don't you trust him? Congratulations, Lord_Nightrose.

Because the statistical probability of achieving such figures in a natural way is practically zero.

Na uh!

I don't understand why someone wants to tweak the download statistics. This is so immature. I always try to avoid downloading my own programs/web pages, so I get a realistic figure about how many people are actually downloading my stuff.

And why I think it was achieved by cheating? Well, I regularly check download statistics. Even the best (qualitatively) authors rarely exceed the average 20-30 downloads per file per week. An extreme exception was the authors of the brand new Doom 83, because it was the only program they released, and it got into the top 5 (both the 83 and the 83+ versions).

The other reason is that checking the directories these files reside in reveals that every other file is downloaded much less times, except for the new ones. But you can in no way justify such a sudden interest in the long time submitted programs of a single author... As I said, if you subtract 50 from the downloads of every file, you get such numbers that perfectly fit into the statistics of the directories in question.

Anyway, if cheating pleases you, lord_nightrose, just go ahead. I don't mind. However, I just can't see the point in it.

For those of us who weren't here last week...how many dl'eds did lord_knightrose have?

I think it was around 3300 compared to the second person with 2700 downloads.

Cheating pleases me because it's a CALCULATOR PROGRAMMING WEB SITE. In the big scheme of things, it doesn't MATTER. If you get so upset over me downloading my own files that you'll post a litany about MATURITY on a CALCULATOR PROGRAMMING WEB SITE, then you have lost touch with reality.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>

long a;

void main()
{
a=1;
while(a>0){
printf("\n%i",a);
a++;
}

What was the point of that?

That looks like a boring program. That would never end, unless, maybe after a LONG time, the number would reset back to 0.

Assuming this is C++, i would say that the long value A would eventually give an error since the ++ would result in a number outside of its domain (stack overflow).

I was assuming it was TI-89 C, but I think you're right.

I think your original assumption is correct. In C++ out-statements are "cout", in C they are fprint which is what is in the code.