ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Community :: Surveys :: 2004
Error!
Failed to query database!

Re: 2004
W Hibdon  Account Info

Man, I am getting too old for this kind of.... Wait, what was the poll again?

-W-

Reply to this comment    1 January 2004, 19:36 GMT


Re: Re: 2004
W Hibdon  Account Info

I cannot remember if I said this before, but the old memory is not what she used to be.

-W-

Reply to this comment    1 January 2004, 19:45 GMT

Re: Re: Re: 2004
Matthew Marshall  Account Info
(Web Page)

I think you said it before.

MWM

Reply to this comment    1 January 2004, 22:03 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
W Hibdon  Account Info

Said what?

-W-

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 00:26 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
Matthew Marshall  Account Info
(Web Page)

I don't know. Do you know?

MWM

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 00:56 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
jrock7286  Account Info

Know what? Where am I? Huh? WHO am I?

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 01:14 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
JAKAS  Account Info

Exactly

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 05:15 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Eh?

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 17:46 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
W Hibdon  Account Info

Hey!! how did these words get on my magic box? I don't remember puting them there!

-W-

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 20:47 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
JAKAS  Account Info

did you forget to lock your lockbox???

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 21:06 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
W Hibdon  Account Info

"Mr. Gore, if you could sum your campagin up in one word, what would it be?"

"Lockbok."

"And Mr. Bush, how would you sum your campagin up in one word?"

"Srategery"

-W-

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 01:43 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
JAKAS  Account Info

That was absolutely the best political debate ever!!!

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 03:40 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

What words were those again?

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 23:17 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

You did say it before. :-)

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 01:44 GMT

Re: 2004
ti_is_good_++  Account Info

There would be a lot more substantive comments if the poll was about 2003.

Reply to this comment    1 January 2004, 20:28 GMT


Re: Re: 2004
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Because 2003 = 2002+1 = PI^6.64121853517... ?

Reply to this comment    1 January 2004, 23:30 GMT

Re: Re: Re: 2004
Matthew Marshall  Account Info
(Web Page)

No, because 2+0+0+3=5, and 5 is half of 10, which is the standard number base.

MWM

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 00:58 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: 2004
jrock7286  Account Info

oh it goes farther than that! 10 is then the sum of the two lucky numbers 7 and 3, and then 73/Pi is approximately 23 and 2+3=5 which is half of the number base of 10, and then...wait a minute...I'm right back where I started! *grr*

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 01:17 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

It's good to know that I'm not the only person who does things like that....(2 * the number of 0's in 2004 = 4)

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 01:46 GMT

Re: ¤
JAKAS  Account Info

Isn't it though?

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 05:17 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

huh?

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 23:15 GMT


Re: ¤
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

wha?

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 16:47 GMT


Re: Re: ¤
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Wow, I LOVE this poll!

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 16:48 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

Right...

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 22:32 GMT


Re: ¤
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Left...

Reply to this comment    4 January 2004, 17:15 GMT


Re: Re: ¤
JAKAS  Account Info

Um... straight?

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 03:40 GMT


Re: ¤
BlackThunder  Account Info
(Web Page)

2 x 0 x 0 x 4 = 0! And the phenomenon of the product being zero will continue until... *punches some numbers into calculator* 2111! More than a hundred years! Cool!

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 00:49 GMT

Re: Re: ¤
Brian Gordon Account Info
(Web Page)

you have your calc on and ready while typing on your computer?
I'm not even going to touch that one.

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 19:48 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

Nothing wrong with that!!! The sad part, in my opinion, is that he needed his calc to figure that out.

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 22:33 GMT

Re: ¤
Brian Gordon Account Info
(Web Page)

why use a calculator? Why not just have a dedicated ENIAC in the room at all times to make all your computations :)

Reply to this comment    4 January 2004, 18:40 GMT


Re: ¤
BlackThunder  Account Info
(Web Page)

I was joking. I didn't even turn on my calculator, which was in a different room.

Reply to this comment    4 January 2004, 21:02 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

That's good. :-)

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 21:37 GMT


Re: Re: ¤
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

2 * 0 * 0 * 4 does NOT equal 0! The factorial of zero is one! ...... isn't it?

Reply to this comment    4 January 2004, 17:15 GMT

Re: Re: Re: ¤
JAKAS  Account Info

Oh dear... um...God i hope your joking. But just in case your not... NO!!!!!!!!!! the only ways to get one from zero are: 0+1 and X^0. That is if you ignore the extremely long redundent pointless equations starting with zero. but no, 2 x 0 x 0 x 4 = 0

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 03:44 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: ¤
jrock7286  Account Info

he didn't meann it didn't equal "0" he meant it didn't equal "0!" as in "zero factorial"

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 18:24 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

But it does...

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 21:40 GMT


¤
burntfuse  Account Info

NO!!!! 2*0*0*4=0, 0!=0, 1!=1

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 21:39 GMT


Re: Re: Re: 2004
ti_is_good_++  Account Info

Note 'substantive'

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 01:29 GMT


2005-1
Maleficus  Account Info

now lets see some nerdy little minds work that one through

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 16:14 GMT


2+0+0+4=6 , 2004/6=334 , 334 - (2004-4)/100 = 314, 314 looks like 3.1415926535897932384626433 8327950288419716939937 51058209...
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Wait, are you dissing nerds? You'd better run...

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 17:50 GMT

Re: the last thing was too long. he he.
JAKAS  Account Info

I wouldn't consider myself a nerd... more of a dork/loser/loner. Although, I would also consider all of those ""bundles of sticks"" who run around smoking pot and sh*t (and think they're the cool ones) losers, so maybe that woudn't make me a lsoer... but i really don't care.

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 21:10 GMT

¤
burntfuse  Account Info

Let me sharpen my voltmeter probes...

Reply to this comment    2 January 2004, 23:16 GMT


nerd-geek
Brian Gordon Account Info
(Web Page)

I'm not a nerd, im a geek. Same mind, different appearance.

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 13:44 GMT


Re: nerd-geek
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

LOL, and now I have a feeling the nerd/geek conversation will commence once again.

Reply to this comment    3 January 2004, 16:48 GMT


Re: Re: nerd-geek
JAKAS  Account Info

Well actually... here's a question.
What is the difference between a Nerd, Geek, and Dork?

Reply to this comment    5 January 2004, 03:45 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer