Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs

Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 15:09:28 -0800
• In-Reply-To: <38026122.4032E829@cse.kau.se>
• References: <v04020a07b424c40dd281@[24.237.5.4]><v04020a00b426cadab7d8@[24.237.5.4]> <3801B928.A3E6812C@cse.kau.se> <v04020a03b427f19741e8@[24.237.5.4]> <v04020a07b42807385710@[24.237.5.4]>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

>> >The problem is that it doesn't work on the 1200 (I'm making a guess that it
>> >needs the onboard SRAM).
>>
>> It needs a real stack.
>
>If 1200 dont have any RAM. How can it know where the program counter
>should jump
>back after subrutines ?

It has a...3...level stack.  :)  Plenty large enough for its 2k of Flash.

>Is it a little stack in a register inside the processor
>or want the processor an external memory to use ?

• RE: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: PerErik Klarenfjord <el8klap@cse.kau.se>
• Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
• Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• From: PerErik Klarenfjord <el8klap@cse.kau.se>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• Next: Re: TI-H: More AVR Qs
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread