Re: TI-H: Interesting thing happened to me and my 92
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Interesting thing happened to me and my 92
I'd be curious to know how that works, since the 68000 isn't even remotely
binary-compatible with the x86 architecture....what are you running on it
now?
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
>Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: TI-H: Interesting thing happened to me and my 92
>Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:20:59 -0800
>
>
> >Yea, no duh!
> >What I ment was does it matter for him?
> >He also said it was slow in the beginning so maybe he just fixed what the
> >dumb fucks in the factory screwed up!
>
>Intel screwed up by ever making the 86.
>
>I've got a Honeywell industrial controll computer from the local youth
>detention center (it controlled climate, jail cells, and security).
>
>Its a one in a million gateway (gateway made the MB). Its got a 68000 co
>processor to the 486SX 20 with a math coprocessor.
>
>That 486DX20 has the response and feeling of a 486 120. Hmmm... I wonder
>why.
>
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
Follow-Ups: