Re: TI-H: Interesting thing happened to me and my 92
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Interesting thing happened to me and my 92
yea ... explain
> I'd be curious to know how that works, since the 68000 isn't even
remotely
> binary-compatible with the x86 architecture....what are you running
on it
> now?
>
> >From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
> >Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> >To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
> >Subject: Re: TI-H: Interesting thing happened to me and my 92
> >Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:20:59 -0800
> >
> >
> > >Yea, no duh!
> > >What I ment was does it matter for him?
> > >He also said it was slow in the beginning so maybe he just fixed
what the
> > >dumb fucks in the factory screwed up!
> >
> >Intel screwed up by ever making the 86.
> >
> >I've got a Honeywell industrial controll computer from the local
youth
> >detention center (it controlled climate, jail cells, and security).
> >
> >Its a one in a million gateway (gateway made the MB). Its got a
68000 co
> >processor to the 486SX 20 with a math coprocessor.
> >
> >That 486DX20 has the response and feeling of a 486 120. Hmmm... I
wonder
> >why.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: