Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message...


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: are we ever ON topic? =) (not a complaining message... i need info)




Clear it up a bit more... Your quotes are out of order, and the people who
said them aren't even the right people...

At 10:41 PM 12/12/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Lessie
>
>Grant > I could have sworn he asked for VJ++... Microsoft's is fine for
>windows.
>Sun's is more of a linux approach.
>
>Me > Sun isn't a "linux" approach.  It's a multi-platform approach.  The JDK
>works
>QUITE fine for MS.
>
>Dan > It would be better if you said "Sun isn't ONLY  a "linux" approach."
>
>Grant > Dan's right.  Suns can run either Solaris which is a flavor of unix,
>or BSD
>(another unix) and what ever else is out there...  Redhat...
>
>Me > I'm running the JDK on win95.. no emulators or anything..  runs
>perfectly
>fine.. even wrote some stupid java apps.  They have both a windows and unix
>version
>on that link I gave ye.
>
>Grant > Suns DON'T emulate Solaris...
>
>Dan > Grant...what the hell are you talking about? He never said that Suns
>emulate
>Solaris. He simply said that he's running the JDK on windows 95.  This is of
>course, because there is a windows 95 compiled version of it.
>
>This clear up any confusion?
>
>I dont even know why I bother.  I just was informing someone that there was
a
>better and free solution out there.  There almost allways is.  I can see
>absolutly
>no reason to buy VJ++, warez it, install it, copy it, or even read the back
>of the
>box.
>
>http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/
>For all Win32 OS's
>
>Pellaeon
>
>
>
>
>


References: