Re: A89: annoying little quirks
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: annoying little quirks
guess what! I was really dissapointed today when I opened my email client
to find 25 messages all relating to this dumb question. If someone says
something wrong, don't get pissed. Just answer it once and if there is
already an answer to it, don't REPEAT IT. It gets really annoying having to
sort though all these pointless messages because everyone thinks they know
what's right. big deal?
>
>What do you mean BASIC functions? The TI-89 is based on the 92+.
>
>--
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
> the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
>On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Pat J wrote:
>
>>
>> NO, the TI-89 is based on the TI-83 on most of the BASIC functions and
the
>> way the keys are laid out.
>> Pat
>> ________________
>> pat@jalyn.com
>> http://come.to/patj/
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robby Gutmann <gutmann@planet-connect.com>
>> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Date: Wednesday, September 09, 1998 4:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: A89: annoying little quirks
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>Actually, the TI-89 is a mix between The TI-92 and the TI-83.
>> >> Pat
>> >
>> >You'se so wrong, it's not even funny. Actually, it is kinda funny.
>> >HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!. Anyway, you're wrong, and the other guy is too (but
>> >you're more wrong than he is). The TI-89 is completely based on the
>> >TI-92+. Absolutely nothing to do with the 83, except for possibly the
>> >case, and I would opine that that is based on the 86, rather than the
83.
>> >So, the moral of the story, girls and boys, is don't say stupid things.
>> >Cuz the Aardvark, or me (when I have time), will catch you on them, and
>> >make you feel stupid.
>> >
>> >Robby Gutmann
>> >gutmann@planet-connect.com
>> >ICQ UIN: 724927 Agonostis on IRC
>> >
>> >Of course, Ankh-Morpork's citizens had always claimed that the river
water
>> >was incredibly pure. Any water that had passed through so many kidneys,
>> >they reasoned, had to be very pure indeed.
>> > -- (Terry Pratchett, Sourcery)
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Follow-Ups: