Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
Heh.
[A] Neither of us started this discussion, only replied to someone else's
accusation... perhaps you should include them as "a piece of work" too...
[B] Do you think that you are hurting either of us by filtering out our
messages? I certainly don't care about whether you filter me or not =P
[C] If you think the list is so useless, why don't you leave? It's much more
useful, from what I have seen, than it was about a year ago...
[D] Before you flame, read through your ISP's acceptable use policies...
it'd suck to get your access taken away... I've already done it once =P
----- Original Message -----
From: Kent Richardson <kentr@san.rr.com>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
> You guys sound like my 3-year old twins. Let me give you a few words of
> advice - GROW UP AND GET OVER IT!!!! This list has become about as
useless
> as you seem to think ticalc.org is. I've already filtered out anything
> from Bryan. Looks like I may have to include Kirk. You two are really a
> piece of work.
References: