Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
You guys sound like my 3-year old twins. Let me give you a few words of
advice - GROW UP AND GET OVER IT!!!! This list has become about as useless
as you seem to think ticalc.org is. I've already filtered out anything
from Bryan. Looks like I may have to include Kirk. You two are really a
piece of work.
At 07:13 PM 12/23/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>No where near a 3 week or even a 1 week delay though..
>
>Bryan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kirk Meyer" <kirkmeyer@bigfoot.com>
>To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
>Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:03 PM
>Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
>
>
>>
>> Bryan you did exactly the same thing when you did file archives (not the
>> email part, the part about giving precedence to assembly) so I don't even
>> want to hear that from you. That's why I got stuck on the backup
>> filearchives job in the first place, because you'd let so many BASIC
>> programs build up =P
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
>> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 3:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: A86: Re: [semi-OT] ticalc file archives
>>
>>
>> > Well, I assume that "cool" assembly games probably get top priority over
>> > there, and then next come other assembly stuff, and BASIC probably is
>only
>> > added when they have time. Seriously, I've been saying this and
>> complaining
>> > about this for months, glad someone also agrees with me about this
>e-mail
>> > thing. :) Your absolutely right, I also rarely get e-mails back from
>> > filearchive@ticalc.org. It seems like with 3 people over there doing
>the
>> > job I used to do by myself, they could _at least_ do as good of a job as
>I
>> > did, and maybe even better... :) But thats what you get when selfish,
>> > greedy, out-of-touch coordinators are making all the decisions.
>> >
>> > Bryan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: