Re: A86: ROM Images (legal battle thread)


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A86: ROM Images (legal battle thread)




You said that every TI-82 assembly program should be removed from
ticalc.org because it was illegally made or something.  That is not true.
You can "hack" your own ROM if you want to.  The problem comes when you
want to send that ROM image to someone else.  Giving your ROM image to
someone else, even if they have the calculator, is still illegal.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Thu, 19 Nov 1998, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:

> 
> At 04:11 AM 11/19/98 +0100, you wrote:
> >Just because distributing the ROM image is illegal, doesn't mean
> >researching your OWN ROM image is also illegal.  You can do anything to
> >your own copy of the ROM as long as you don't give a copy of your ROM to
> >anyone else.
> 
> All I was doing was clarifying what this person was saying.  I was just
> checking to see if they agreed with me and they apparently do agree through
> the e-mail that they sent to the list in reply to my message.  What you are
> saying doesn't even coincide with what either of us were saying.
> 
> >On Wed, 18 Nov 1998, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
> >
> >> >ti did not support assembly on the ti-82, so it was NOT meant to be
> >> >programmed, which voids all uses of "programming research" in
> investigating
> >> >the rom of the ti-82. in contrast, ti supported assembly on the ti-86,
> so it
> >> >was meant to be programmed, justifying the "programming research" claim.
> >> 
> >> So, according to the paragraph that you have just written, you are fully
> >> supporting everything that I have said.  Since "programming research" is
> >> void for the investigation of the 82 ROM image, then every last assembly
> >> shell, game, and program must be deleted from the TI-82 directories at
> >> ticalc.org (and other major sites) or they are in serious legal trouble
> >> since everything can be linked to "programming research" on the 82 ROM.
> >> Yet, you also give the EXCEPTION that it is perfectly legal to distribute
> >> the 86 ROM image since TI supported assembly under the legal umbrella of
> >> "programming research."  So, I'm just making sure that you know that you
> >> are _FOR_ 86 ROM image distribution and _AGAINST_ 82 ROM distribution
> >> because of one minor thing:  internal assembly support.  You are saying
> >> therefore that it is perfectly legal to distribute any TI ROM image that
> >> has internal assembly support.  This excludes the TI-85 and TI-82
> >> calculators only.
> 
> 
>                  Thomas J. Hruska -- thruska@tir.com
> Shining Light Productions -- "Meeting the needs of fellow programmers"
>          http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Heights/8504
>                     http://shinelight.home.ml.org
> 


References: