[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: ZPic83 compression
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Bj=F6rnhager?= <jensbj@home.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:02:26 -0700
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020610104230.009f9cc0@mail.bellsouth.net> <001301c21116$86df5090$021a450a@mindcooler> <004301c210d4$76d6e060$838d86cb@l3o6v0> <000901c2115b$98d77b70$021a450a@mindcooler> <001f01c2122e$6f97a540$080a0a0a@ronald>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


> > > Writing both is a good idea to check sizes.  but a vertical one would
> > > also be much larger..
> >
> > I don't see why thay would be..
>
> Because the bytes are read left-to-right. If you do a bit-level vertical
> compression, you'll have to read the 1st bit of the 1st byte, then the 1st
> bit of the 13th byte, then the 1st bit of the 25th byte, etc.

Ah, a lot more traffic from the lcd driver..

Follow-Ups:

[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

From: "Joe Pemberton" <joe@joepnet.com>

References:

[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

From: Charlie Adams <charlieadams@bellsouth.net>

[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Bj=F6rnhager?= <jensbj@home.se>

[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

From: "Nat Allan" <nallan@hotkey.net.au>

[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Bj=F6rnhager?= <jensbj@home.se>

[A83] Re: ZPic83 compression

From: "Ronald Teune" <rtwolf@gmx.net>