Re: A82: Confirm Calendar Bug..

To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A82: Confirm Calendar Bug..
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 17:46:49 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-82-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
References: <01bd8e67$179d4380$LocalHost@ahmed-el-helw>
Reply-To: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org


Ahmed El-Helw wrote:

> Hey,
>     Would someone clarify to me 100% .. what is wrong w/my Calendar program?
> Should 2000 be 29 days or is it correct as 28?  If it is incorrect, then is
> all 400x years [0,400,800,...] have 29 days whereas all other 100 years have
> 28?   Can someone tell me for sure?  I will probably also add saving feature
> in the next version... Thanks for any help.
>
> -Ahmed
>
> ahmedre@bellsouth.net
>
> http://asm8x.home.ml.org

1600, 2000, 2400 are not leap years because they are divisible by 400.
1700,1800,1900 are leap years.

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

Follow-Ups:

Re: A82: Confirm Calendar Bug..

From: l0rdg0at@juno.com (Greg Milewski)

References:

A82: Confirm Calendar Bug..

From: "Ahmed El-Helw" <ahmedre@bellsouth.net>