Hey! Looks like a great game!! Is anyone planning on porting it to the 83??? That would be sooooo great!!! Thanks!!
-Joel

It was for the 83 before it was for the 85. You can download the 83 version by clicking on the "Web Page" link above in this comment.

just seeing if the HTML tags do work. my guesses r no, but here goes anyways
<Font color = "#FF0000"> <Blink> <center> Did it work? </Font color> </Blink> </center>

hehe, no.... ticalc has them disabled, i'm not quite sure why?

Well, for one, he had bad syntax w/ overlapping tags, not nested.
On a related, on topic note however, I know there is a zelda for the 83, but has it been ported to the 82? If so, what is the file name?

82 version is newer than 83 version, but still only 1 level.

yeah, it would be pretty cool if you could get it on the 82, but just think of all the problems you would have running it, slow memory, weird screen, i dunno.... stuff like that.

Because it would be REALLY easy to abuse the comment boards if we allowed HTML tags. Consider the following inserted in a comment:

<IMG SRC="http:// www.myserver.null /big.gif">

Where "big.gif" is a 1mb porn image. Consider not only how long it would take to load the page, but also that people could insert images wherever they pleased?

wow, good thinking

Couldn't it be possible for the CGI-BIN program to recognize and use only useful text editing HTML commands such as bold and Italics As well as it having the ability to not put the "Reply to this comment" link if a thread gets too big (around 7 threads)? That way, You can relax or even remove the 15 letter limit on words in the comments.

I've asked for a comment depth level limit, but I keep getting told that we don't need it. Huh. 15 characters will have to stay for a while, though, because consider if we allowed the word pneumonoultram icroscopisilic ovolcanocon iosis to be put onto a single line, it could possibly cause problems, no?

As for checking for 'benign' HTML, that is kind of hard, and certainly would take a lot of processor to do, because of all the quirks possible. I'd rather not load down the server checking things like that. IMHO, _this_ is good enough for underline, and THIS is good enough for bold. What else would you want? Also consider if somebody did <FONT SIZE="20"> or something. (I know you can't do that _explicitly_, but you can do it in other ways.)

isn't *this* bold? anyways, all the current rules make sense, though there _should_ be a depth level limit, so keep asking.

You did have your </whatever> tags set backwards. Here's another test:

<a href = "http://www.calc.org"> Dimension TI </a>

Did that work?

<hr>

Did that?

Didn't all of the people ahead of you just say that HTML tags don't work?

I couldn't help but notice that u left a border on ur reference pictures. If u want to get rid of them then do the following... at the end of ur img src tag before the final > put in a border = 0

Why the hell would that matter? It was just a litte, unnecessary (as many others have pointed out) test :) He didn't care about a border, he just wants to find out for himself that something won't work. How's that for babbling about nothingness?

Congrats on the port, it looks good, aside from those differences listed, how does it play? First post hehe :P

not really, but u only lost by one min.
too bad

I think its just nice to see something for the 85, period. I hate having to play frogger, plainjump, ztetris, and pipe dreams gets tiring.

Umm... you might wanna try some link games. They much more difficult to get "tired" of.

I know how u feel bout playing the same games but think back when zshell was THE shell. To have plainjump was the bomb.

You might also want to try out pacman00, solomon's key, or Hard Hat Mack. They are fairly new and good

my mistake, i meant pacman99.
i meant no offense whatsoever. just a type.
sorry

>just a type.
You made a typo on the word Typo. heh.

good call... dammit.
i need work on my typing skillz
yes i meant "skills" w/ a "z"

If 'skillz' had been a typing error, I would be laughing my head off, thinking of you smashing your keyboard in...

BTW, it is ALWAYS the keyboard's fault... :)