Re: TI-H: Expanders?

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: Expanders?
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 18:55:06 -0800 (AKDT)
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <35AD5A01.70D5D11F@geocities.com>
References: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.980715201659.15899A-100000@y.glue.umd.edu> <l0313030fb1d297e0b991@[192.168.1.66]> <35b182d1.10903137@pilot.msu.edu>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Well, a driver is already written thats good (vats there).  I realy don't
understnad, or enjoy working on a processor unless it has 32 general
purpose registers to play with, even if you can only use 16 for general
purposes...  ;)

>btw, who WOULD accept an idea that dumb AND impractical anyway?
>But seriously, that's more work that just starting over, Grant...  and it's
>accepted, not excepted.  just being a pain in your @$$...

References:

TI-H: Expanders?

From: "Eric M. Fiterman" <ericf@Glue.umd.edu>

RE: TI-H: Expanders?

From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>

Re: TI-H: Expanders?

From: tsaimelv@pilot.msu.edu (Mel Tsai)

Re: TI-H: Expanders?

From: Christopher Kalos <raptorone@geocities.com>

Prev: Re(2): TI-H: IDE HD Progress
Next: Re: TI-H: Link port expander/strengthener
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread