|
Results
|
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
|
Function
|
12
|
34.3%
|
|
|
Parametric
|
8
|
22.9%
|
|
|
Polar
|
4
|
11.4%
|
|
|
Sequence
|
1
|
2.9%
|
|
|
Differential equation
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
|
3-D
|
10
|
28.6%
|
|
|
Statistics plots
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
Re: What is your favorite graphing mode?
|
Zeroko 
(Web Page)
|
|
I chose parametric, since it is the most versatile. I do wish there was a mode that let you specify each pixel's value as a function of its coordinates (that was fast enough, of course).
I know it can be done via ASM, but once it requires writing code on a PC I could just use the PC to do the rendering in the first place, & if it let you use EOS/AMS code for the function definitions it would probably be too slow even with ASM for the rendering loop.
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
14 June 2013, 18:54 GMT
|
|
|
Re: What is your favorite graphing mode?
|
KermMartian
(Web Page)
|
|
I chose 3D, because I enjoy plotting 3D functions and making 3D graphing applications. The others are fine too, of course.
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 June 2013, 22:14 GMT
|
|
|
Re: What is your favorite graphing mode?
|
|
ordelore
|
|
I prefer 3D because the graphs just LOOK cooler.
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 July 2013, 17:33 GMT
|
|
|
