ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Community :: Surveys :: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Error!
Failed to query database!

Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
BLAlien  Account Info

I voted for a color display, but then I realized that for really good color, I would need more memory, a faster processor, and a higher resolution. Too late to change my vote, though. Oh well...

Reply to this comment    26 March 2000, 01:36 GMT

Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Michael Brunner  Account Info
(Web Page)

What would be the use of having a color display? It will just drain your Batteries faster than the Florida aquifer!

Reply to this comment    26 March 2000, 04:23 GMT

Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Amalfi Marini  Account Info

I think there many things I would rather have in a calculator . First , a cartridge slot , cartridges can be games , programs , flash/archive memory for users. the slot can be a comunication port too...(?)beeing able to connect the calc to an external modem specially designed for the calc (modem can be compatible with PC too) , beeing able to connect the calc to a printer , or whatever you want <---(all this will need a lot of work and good programing )
Have 2 cursors , one to trace the graph , the other to scroll the graph ( without the need of regraphing , thing that have to be programed ) .
possibility to connect an AC/DC power supply , in order to save our batts when we're in home . A good Ams that takes FULL advantage of the processor .

Then , Large amount of RAM memory would be nice(4Mb or more)
The color LCD screen with high resolution can improves a lot of things . The speed of the processor can be increased adding cache memory (?) . Anyway a good M68k at 20Mhz is enough .

forget about the printer and the modem ....

Reply to this comment    26 March 2000, 04:44 GMT

Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Daryl Benzel  Account Info

Ok, man now we're talking serious pocket pilot type engineering for a calculator! Yeah it would be very nice, convenient, etc for this, but do you realistically think that ti would really market something that impressive, which to begin with was a little solar-powered device that multiplies numbers? Honestly I dont think so.
--Daryl

Reply to this comment    26 March 2000, 08:58 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Gary Moorhead  Account Info

Why not?
they made the 92

Reply to this comment    27 March 2000, 08:51 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Daryl Benzel  Account Info

Yes but the 92 is a precise graphing calculator made specifically for college students. Yes this is a very nice piece of equipment, but it is nowhere near what he was talking about. And I also think TI won't take it much further than that of the 92+.
--Daryl

Reply to this comment    27 March 2000, 15:15 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Gary Moorhead  Account Info

True but did anyone ever think TI would make a calculator that could manipulate variables as well as numbers? Eventually they will have a calc that can do all of these things, it's just a matter of time.

Reply to this comment    28 March 2000, 07:23 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Daryl Benzel  Account Info

Maybe so, and yes the 92 is already more than the wildest dreams for people back in the day but manipulation of variables was one of the first new operations for the calculator, as you need it to graph linear equations, etc, so good point, bad example.
--Daryl

Reply to this comment    28 March 2000, 14:39 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Gary Moorhead  Account Info

that is not true, you don't manipulate variables to graph functions, you substitute values for variables. All previous calculators saw variables as numbers and nothing else

Reply to this comment    29 March 2000, 06:45 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Daryl Benzel  Account Info

What the hell do you think Y1, Y2, Y3, etc are???? Variables!!!!!
--Daryl

Reply to this comment    31 March 2000, 15:24 GMT


TI doesn't need to do anything
Joe Somebody  Account Info

Color screen: blue was produced on the 83+ with a special program hehehe

Cartridges: I have been thinking of this myself - a simple card reader connected to a little TI cable which is connected to a TI with appropriate software

more RAM: probably the most needed upgrade and the hardest, but heck, we know alot about TI hardware - it can be done

a MODEM: TCP/IP for 68k calcs has already been created, now all that needs to be done is to write an ASM program that can tell the linking port to connect to telephone lines

a printer: just use the graph-link software - DOH!

sound: already been done

a decent GUI: I'm working on that ;)

make the calc better than a palm pilot: you dont need these mods to do that - there's a wider range of useful software and better games for the calc than there is for palm pilot! not to mention just how bad palm pilot keyboards are! heck, I BOUGHT A TI-92+ AS A POCKET PC NOT FOR MATH CLASS!!! and i could have bought an old palm pilot on ebay for just twice as much, but I LOVE THE TI-BASIC LANGUAGE AND I LOVE TICALC.ORG's WONDERFUL SOFTWARE!!!

Reply to this comment    13 February 2005, 17:23 GMT

Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
The_Untouchable_One

Okay, I think you're taking it a little too far. I'm not downing you or anything but those specs are a little too much, except for the AC/DC power supply. If TI were to produce this calc(palm computer), are you willing to pay the $600 cost that comes with it??

Happy wishing!!

Reply to this comment    27 March 2000, 04:06 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Daryl Benzel  Account Info

Exactly my point.
--Daryl

Reply to this comment    27 March 2000, 15:17 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
CircaX  Account Info
(Web Page)

I think cartriges are a good Idea. Make games easier to distribute, and with your official TI-Burner83, you can make money selling your "games" to classmates. hehe...

Reply to this comment    29 March 2000, 04:55 GMT

Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Rajamani Gounder  Account Info

Man, that would be awesome! It would totally eliminate the memory problem, as you could keep buying disks or cartridges to store things on. The only problem is cost and time for making something that kicks ass like that.

Reply to this comment    30 March 2000, 00:08 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
ericman2000
(Web Page)

We can all quit dreaming! Visit www.handspring.com and pick up a Visor for the cost of a TI-89! Expansion slot, more memory (up to 8MEGS!), TONS AND TONS AND TONS of applications, and a faster processor! Download PawCalc and you have an instant scientific calc.
Oh... Now I remember why I still have my 89. Graphing. Ooo, that hurts.


LIGHT BULB!
Hey! Someone could create a graphing calc application!

Reply to this comment    30 March 2000, 02:14 GMT


Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Robert Mohr  Account Info

They already have most of this stuff--it's called GAME BOY.

Reply to this comment    1 April 2000, 05:36 GMT

Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
Amalfi Marini  Account Info

Have you seen the TI-15 ? it has a nice problem solving !
for example , the calculator gives the problem 6+2=?
you try to answer 7 , but the calc responds with "no"
then shows that 6+2>7 , so you try to answer 8 , the calc responds with "yes" letting you know you got the correct answer !!!

Sometimes I want to become a child again and have a TI-15 , to discuss things like 2+3 or solving things that other calcs don't , instead of discussing incompatibilities with roms , games and all those things that give us problems and headaches . Beeing a child again , and I will not be worried about integrals and derivatives anymore...!!!!

Reply to this comment    26 March 2000, 05:26 GMT

Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
programerman

Thanks. I needed a laugh.

Reply to this comment    28 March 2000, 01:41 GMT


Re: Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
JaggedFlame

roms and games don't exactly give me headaches... but yeah you're right i guess...

Reply to this comment    29 March 2000, 02:07 GMT

Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
nike  Account Info

I would much rather have more memory. Being able to put complex games on your calc and still having a lot of memory left would be awesome. I think a megabyte should be enough. Second on my list would be higher resolution. Being able to fit a lot of stuff on the screen would be great. Third would be faster processor. This couldn't hurt. Compatibility would come fourth, and the thing I couldn't care less about would be color. Unless it was really high quality, color would be pointless. Grayscale on the 89/92(+) looks really good anyway. It is good enough for me.
That's just my opinion.
-Jordan

Reply to this comment    26 March 2000, 05:27 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer