ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Community :: Surveys :: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Error!
Failed to query database!

Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Coolv  Account Info
(Web Page)

Different CPU, of course! ~V~

Reply to this comment    19 April 2005, 21:06 GMT

Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Ben Cherry  Account Info
(Web Page)

Why? We would need a lot of work to get assembly up and running on a new processor, whereas with z80 there are tons of applications already put together for easy asm development, and for 68k we even have TIGCC, which could fairly easily be modified to accomodate a new 68k calc.

Reply to this comment    19 April 2005, 21:58 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
burntfuse  Account Info
(Web Page)

It doesn't have to be THAT different - A Z380 (my personal preference for a new processor) would be much faster and generally more powerful than a Z80, but maintain complete backwards compatibility.

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 21:32 GMT


Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Ray Saito  Account Info

Yes, we should get dual Intel Xeon processors on the calculator with 4GB RAM (DDR2), equipped with a color TFT screen =] Ok, nvm... That would cost about $700 to get into a desktop, don't even want to think about the price to compress it into a calc, lol.

But I still think that a new processor would be a good idea... If not, I'd prefer z80 over 68k cause I can actually program asm on z80, lol

Reply to this comment    19 April 2005, 22:51 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Shawn Zhang Account Info

On 68K, nobody needs to program ASM!!! 68K C and BASIC are both pretty fast, and probably almost as fast as ASM.

<off topic>
COBOL should be implemented in whatever OS is written for the new CPU because COBOL would bridge the gap between BASIC and ASM. It is as efficient as BASIC and as easy-to-program as ASM!

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 20:29 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
CajunLuke  Account Info
(Web Page)

>> It is as efficient as BASIC and as easy-to-program as ASM!

You're being sarcastic, right?

Reply to this comment    21 April 2005, 02:40 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Andy Janata  Account Info
(Web Page)

Of course he is! But I think the next calc should have a punch card reader, but who cares what I think? :)

Reply to this comment    21 April 2005, 05:20 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
CajunLuke  Account Info
(Web Page)

I'd go for that. Anything to save memory space. (I'm the dude who wants a slide rule and a handheld mechanical adder.)

Reply to this comment    22 April 2005, 20:05 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
burntfuse  Account Info
(Web Page)

No, he isn't. Look again more carefully - the "efficiency of BASIC" (Which is not very much...) and the "ease-of-use of assembly" (Which keeps many people programming in BASIC...). ;-D

Reply to this comment    24 April 2005, 00:59 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Kevin Kofler Account Info
(Web Page)

TI-BASIC? Fast???

Reply to this comment    22 April 2005, 23:31 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Shawn Zhang Account Info

ya, dual 3.8GHz Xeons with EM64T and way more than 4GB ram cuz you can!

Reply to this comment    21 April 2005, 18:53 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Ben Cherry  Account Info
(Web Page)

Nah, get one of the hot new dual core Opterons that's coming out pretty soon from AMD...

Reply to this comment    22 April 2005, 06:17 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
burntfuse  Account Info
(Web Page)

Might as well stick in a hot-swappable RAID array of 200 GB drives while you're at it...

Reply to this comment    22 April 2005, 19:33 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Which type of CPU would you like to see on a new TI calculator: z80 or 68K?
Shawn Zhang Account Info

I laugh in your face! 200GB hard drives? You're so outdated... Get an array of 400TB hard drives.

Reply to this comment    23 April 2005, 17:06 GMT

*GASP*
Shawn Zhang Account Info

You know, I never realized that calcs had CPUs! I also can't believe that anything doesn't run windows!!!

Reply to this comment    19 April 2005, 21:44 GMT

Re: *GASP*
CajunLuke  Account Info
(Web Page)

Restraining several mean and derogatory comments.

Keep your mouth shut.

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 01:34 GMT

DISCLAIMER
CajunLuke  Account Info
(Web Page)

I was referring to the Windows comment; it took me six months or so to realize they had CPUs, too.

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 01:41 GMT


Re: Re: *GASP*
CajunLuke  Account Info
(Web Page)

And while I'm in rant mode, learn to capitalize proper nouns like "Windows".

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 01:42 GMT


Re: Re: Re: *GASP*
Shawn Zhang Account Info

I was just kidding, and since windows is not capitalized, that means that i cant believe that anything wont junp out a window :)

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 20:30 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: *GASP*
burntfuse  Account Info
(Web Page)

Don't worry, I think everyone else knew you weren't serious.

Reply to this comment    20 April 2005, 21:33 GMT


Go Firefox!
Tzazak  Account Info

Wait, he wasn't serious? I thought everyone who talked about Windows liked it. I mean, it comes with IE...how can you not like it?!?!?!

Reply to this comment    22 April 2005, 02:52 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: *GASP*
elfprince13 Account Info
(Web Page)

I was getting worried

Reply to this comment    22 April 2005, 16:19 GMT


Re: *GASP*
Ryan Nazaretian  Account Info

You meen everything doesn't run windows, because windows doesn't run at all ;). Windows really sucks, especially XP. I have it on both of my computers, both fairly new, and still have problems. Both of my computers crashed within these two weeks, Have my desktop working right now (on the internet), and my laptop has issues with it like no sound, video problems, and other driver related issues. I hate Windows, and want to go to Linux, but I would have to sacrifice all of my precise games, programs, and other things with Knopix.

Reply to this comment    24 April 2005, 20:49 GMT

Re: Re: *GASP*
Chris Williams  Account Info

It's weird that WinXP seems to die withing the first month. With two installations of XP (two different computers), they've died a total of at least five times, mostly because their registries get corrupted (what's up with that??). After the first month, they run more or less smoothly (though with other problems, of course).

I say it's better to lose your precious games, programs, and other things intentionally (and only once) by going to Knoppix than to lose them accidentally because Windows trips over itself again and again. :)

You don't necessarily have to give up everything, though, if you can get Wine and other emulators working well enough. I use VTI using Wine. I downloaded DOSEMU (a DOS emulator, http://dosemu.org) so I could run my old DOS games and a DOS CAD program my dad uses. It works a lot better than I expected, and the CAD program runs under DOSEMU but doesn't even run under WinXP! Similarly for my Apache game, which works in DOSEMU but not in Win98.

Reply to this comment    25 April 2005, 00:11 GMT


Re: Re: Re: *GASP*
Kevin Kofler Account Info
(Web Page)

You don't have to run VTI under WINE, you can use TiEmu (68k) or TiLEM (Z80) instead.

Reply to this comment    25 April 2005, 21:48 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: *GASP*
Chris Williams  Account Info

I know, but it's what I have, so I'm sticking with it for now (at least until I install GNU/Linux).

Reply to this comment    26 April 2005, 01:27 GMT


Re: Re: *GASP*
Sebastian Schmied Account Info

There's no need to sacrifice your games. You can run Windows and Linux on the same machine.

Reply to this comment    25 April 2005, 19:07 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer