ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Community :: Surveys :: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
Error!
Failed to query database!

Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
techfury  Account Info

[The text of this article has been removed by a news editor due to violation of the acceptable use policy.]

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 18:02 GMT

HOW DID YOU BEAT ME?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

I always use the black link, since I have three. Everybody else at school uses a USB link. Does the USB even work with TI-Graph Link? I think it's faster than TI-Connect, and it's easier to use, IMO.

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 18:07 GMT

Re: HOW DID YOU BEAT ME?
techfury  Account Info

Yea, I think the USB link does work with GraphLink2 for PC, but TI Connect for mac is practically all the PC GraphLinks merged together, and supports all linkable models. I know USB links work with GraphLink2 for mac as well, but I use TIConnect in that case.

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 18:39 GMT


Re: Re: HOW DID YOU BEAT ME?
thechessmaster88 Account Info

my usb cable work with vti. somebody help!

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 03:58 GMT


Re: Re: Re: HOW DID YOU BEAT ME?
Ryan Kearney  Account Info
(Web Page)

i have version 2.5 beta 5 and i dont think it supports usb i looked and i only see black and gray link and parallel port

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 04:16 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: HOW DID YOU BEAT ME?
Rob van Wijk  Account Info

2.5 beta 5 does not support the USB link. Maybe the next version will, but you'll have to wait a bit for it. (VTI 3 is currently being developed, but from what I've heard, it will take at least some months before it's finished.)
In the meantime, you could look at TiLP.

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 17:30 GMT


Re: HOW DID YOU BEAT ME?
ejona  Account Info

TiLP works the best. And yes, I have found that TI-GraphLink works better than TI-Connect. However, in all, a lot comes down to which link you use. I consistantly get a 3x+ faster transfer with my black link in comparison to my USB. And its not even my computer; a friend of mine gets better with his black and not his USB. I don't know why because the USB ports have a faster transfer speed.

I have used TI-GraphLink, TI-Connect, and TiLP, and out of those TiLP ranks first. Although you have to use a different driver if you like the USB link, it is still worth it. I like it to start with a certain folder so I also changed the default folder to open to in the ini file. The best part of it is it gives you control of everything - from whatever cord, to whatever wait times, to whatever tranfer tuning, even to the OS you prefer. Every one should at least try it out for two weeks and then go back to TI-GraphLink or TI-Connect. The only thing it doesn't do is making TI-Basic programs and that is no big loss.

Reply to this comment    18 June 2003, 16:39 GMT

Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
W Hibdon  Account Info

Damn you and your mac! I say this only because you have a mac, and I am stuck with this crappy XP machine.

-God, I want a mac, W-

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 18:53 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
techfury  Account Info

I know how ya feel man, Windows machines suck, but Windows 2000 Pro is actually pretty darn good.

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 19:12 GMT


~
angelboy Account Info
(Web Page)

Isn't windows 2000 server supposed to be pretty good?

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 20:17 GMT

Re: ~
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

I dunno... I've only used Linux servers...

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 21:21 GMT


Re: ~
benryves  Account Info
(Web Page)

It's just Win2KPro + Added server tools. We run a server here at school, we set it up ourselves (and are by no means professionals!) and it works like a dream - we even have an FTP & HTTP server running on it to serve 6 machines :)
It acts as a gateway to the school proxy to get us our beloved internet connection.
We have 1 Lisucks box, but it never seems to be working! (It's always having to be reinstalled). I never touch it. All the other machines are Win2KPro+1 XP Pro.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 12:05 GMT

Re: Re: ~
Soth  Account Info
(Web Page)

If Linux needs constant reinstalling someone isn't setting it up properly. Tell them to get O'Reilly's Linux in a Nutshell. It should be very useful.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 17:40 GMT


Re: Re: Re: ~
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Maybe that's why Windows doesn't work for some of you guys...

Reply to this comment    19 June 2003, 23:57 GMT


Re: Re: ~
Neo-Soft Account Info
(Web Page)

Um....did You just say Linsucs? My school (a rich magnet school hehehe) has an entire lab of Linux computers all on a LAN connected to a group of about 5 Linux servers. They work like a dream unlike the crappy Win2k server in the corner nobody ever uses. Not only that but Windows servers are a laughing stock of security, its best to use Linux. Don't insult Linux becasue you're too incompetent to understand it (and its superiority). Anyway...like somebody else said, look on websites to figure out what's wrong wit your Linux box...you'll be happy when your website is saved from hacking.

btw...unless your a graphic artist, etc. Mac SUCKS!

Reply to this comment    19 June 2003, 22:55 GMT


Re: Re: Re: ~
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Hahaha, Linsux- that's great! ;-)


You know, most people who like Linsux and hate Windows don't have a valid reason for not liking Windows. If you get a good Windows OS, you'll be fine.

Yes, and Macs do suck... I don't like the interface... and no compatible software (*ahem* same problem with Linsux)

Reply to this comment    20 June 2003, 00:04 GMT


Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
John Albright  Account Info

I HATE Macintosh!

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 20:04 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

I do too, but I don't want to start another Win vs. Mac fights :) (Because WINdows would WIN... j/k)

Reply to this comment    15 June 2003, 21:23 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
molybdenum  Account Info

Untill I saw the JK, my heart was filled with rage. I don't really know what is best, my computer sucks so much linux crashes on it (: Got tired of trying to find out how to make my pos soundcard work and went back to 98. Not going to start any fights.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 00:26 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
Pooner278  Account Info
(Web Page)

I personally use a black link w/ my oldschool TI-86 since TI didnt think about my small calculator community when they made TI-connect.

Anyways for the mac vs. pc battle, go look at the link above. Its pretty funny.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 03:57 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

10.1MB? There's no way my little 56k could handle that...

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 03:39 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
W Hibdon  Account Info

Eh, it is still funny, and you should go to your library and watch it or something.

-W-

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 16:46 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

What's it about?

LOL... I think I want to see this :)

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 17:11 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
techfury  Account Info

Nah, heres the best Apple switch ad (in Japanese tho): http://apple.co.jp/ switch/realpeople/ momokokikuchi_tvad.html (remove spaces)

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 22:48 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Well, I can't read Japanese, so I probably wouldn't get it :(

Reply to this comment    18 June 2003, 01:11 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
techfury  Account Info

Its just a commercial, but its really funny. I got a friend of mine to translate it, and its a typical Switch ad.

Reply to this comment    18 June 2003, 03:36 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
techfury  Account Info

Well, the person in the commercial seems well.........stoned. Its really worth seeing.

Reply to this comment    19 June 2003, 16:57 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

LOL... maybe I'll take a peek if I get a chance to use a cable modem...

Reply to this comment    20 June 2003, 00:05 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
Michael O'Brien  Account Info
(Web Page)

Thats why I used my schools laptops, a CF PCMCIA adapter and their T1 connection...oh the fun I had...BTW Mac/Apple rules! though I could lagitametely support both.

Reply to this comment    18 June 2003, 00:17 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
W Hibdon  Account Info

Where have you been?

-W-

Reply to this comment    18 June 2003, 17:53 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

That's right, he hasn't been here in a few days...

Reply to this comment    19 June 2003, 03:10 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Your heart was "filled with rage"... that sounds violent ;-)

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 21:49 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Do you run Linux and use link software under it?
rmohr02 Account Info
(Web Page)

Why? Or are you just making an uneducated claim?

I will agree that Mac OS 9 and below sucked. OS X, however, is based on BSD, and will run X11 (the x window system), so I don't see anything wrong with it.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 04:13 GMT


The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
JcN  Account Info

Mac OS and Mac products are known for their usefulness and resilience, but Microsoft OS's and products are known for speed and for more software support. It just depends on what you're looking for: If you value quality machinary and software over tons of compatability, then use a mac. If you value the ability to use all of your software and future software with great ease and being able to avoid a lot of compatability issues over more frequent crashes, but cheaper and/or easier repairs and more upgradability, then use Microsoft. I would have an iMac or a G4 right now because of their stream-lined OS, but my parents all have Microsoft computers and my dad especially did not want me having to deal with limited hardware and software compatability, so I have a Compaq Presario 6000 using Windows XP Home Edition instead. Truthfully, I don't care, because they both have workable advantages.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 04:26 GMT

Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
benryves  Account Info
(Web Page)

I have WinXP Home. And for those who say it is ugly: Click the Web Page link.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 12:07 GMT


Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
slimey_limey  Account Info
(Web Page)

Yep, that's ugly.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 16:35 GMT


Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
W Hibdon  Account Info

WHAT?!? That looks sweet! Where can I download that theme?

-W-

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 17:42 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
benryves  Account Info
(Web Page)

www.wincustomize.com

Go to the WindowBlinds section, do a search for dinksDX.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 18:09 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
W Hibdon  Account Info

Thanks.

-W-

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 19:25 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Yeah, it does look cool (so does your z80 compiler)

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 22:09 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
benryves  Account Info
(Web Page)

I like that skin 'cos of the extra buttons it wedges in next to the clock: on the right hand side it adds transparency, shrink to system tray, display properties, WindowBlinds, &c and on the left it holds some shortcuts.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 22:14 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
W Hibdon  Account Info

Those shortcuts is your "quicklaunch" bar. Basically a folder named "quick launch" that has shortcuts in it. You don't need winblinds to have it.

-W-

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 22:35 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
benryves  Account Info
(Web Page)

Er... no, I know what the QuickLaunch is. This is actually attached to the top-left of all Windows windows.

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 14:48 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
W Hibdon  Account Info

Sorry, i thought that you were talking about the taskbar. You went on about things next to the clock, I did not realize you were talking about something different.

-W-

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 16:45 GMT

Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
slimey_limey  Account Info
(Web Page)

> If you value the ability to use all of your
> software and future software with great ease and
> being able to avoid a lot of compatability issues
> over more frequent crashes, but cheaper and/or
> easier repairs and more upgradability, then use
> Microsoft.

This makes no sense. Could someone please clarify? (It's the sentence layout that I can't understand.)

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 16:37 GMT


Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
Soth  Account Info
(Web Page)

He's saying.
If you want a budget 'idiot' proof box, and don't mind lack of stability, go IBM compatible with M$.
Else, get a Mac (costs more, less software on market, but is a really good machine.)

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 17:42 GMT


Mac vs Microsoft: Why isn't the third option listed?
slimey_limey  Account Info
(Web Page)

Thank you for the clarification. As for me, however, I prefer customizeability, so I go with Linux.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 18:47 GMT


Re: Mac vs Microsoft: Why isn't the third option listed?
Soth  Account Info
(Web Page)

All the way...

Reply to this comment    17 June 2003, 18:38 GMT


Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
burntfuse  Account Info

Yeah, they both have their advantages. Too bad that both their software isn't compatible.....

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 17:46 GMT


Re: Re: The Unaltered Truth about Mac vs Microsoft
techfury  Account Info

Um..... heard of Virtual PC by Connectix (now I think Microsoft distributes it)? I have it on my iBook, and run Windows 2K pro in it.

Reply to this comment    16 June 2003, 23:49 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer