Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Re(2): TI-H: Rom version?




you could think of it that way, but to be consisntent, you would say:
 2nd more alpha 6

At 04:59 AM 1/5/99 +0100, you wrote:
>
>No, its really 2nd-more-alpha-S :)
>
>-- 
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>   File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
>   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
>On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, David Norelid wrote:
>
>> 
>> no, its 2nd mode, aplha S. my bad
>> 
>> 
>> FUZZ
>> David Norelid
>> Fuzz Enterprises Inc.
>> -------------------
>> listen.to/yankovic
>> 
>
>


References: