Re: TI-H: I know I'm going to regret this...
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: I know I'm going to regret this...
Have you notived that it is written better than MSDOS? Its fast! :)
Its not MSDOS compatible, its a DOS replacement. The programmers didn't
design it to be a clone of MSDOS, but a substitute for it. its completely
compatible with DOS programs, but is written in a different way than MSDOS.
Grant
>found one problem with it though... why does it take up so extremly much
>memory?
>it grabbes 117K of conventional ram.. 4dos takes 4k.. maybe it workes
>better
>with its own kernel...
>
>//Olle
>
>Olle Hedman wrote:
>>
>> Grant Stockly wrote:
>> > >Isn't it then a problem to run it with win95?
>> > I've never tried, because I don't care for win95. :)
>>
>> > >When I run win95, I dont like the shell command.com provides so I use
>>4dos
>> > >instead.
>> > This is a command.com and OS replacement
>>
>> I tried to run the command.com from FreeDOS under w95.. worked perfectly!
>> I'll try to use it for a while, and see how I like it.
>> Had one very big plus.. it was the first shell for DOS I've seen that has
>> "real" tabcompletion..
>> that is, completes as far as it can, and then if you tab again, shows a
>>list..
>> all others has some strange version where you have to tab throug all that
>> matches.. very bad..
>> If it has coloring too, I think this is my new shell for dos :)
>>
>> //Olle
Follow-Ups:
References: