Re: TI-H: random email


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: random email




K.  I'll have to make a "clean" version though...maybe in a week it will be
fully done?  I don't know.

>Cool!  I'd love to help test it!  Taking notes in class has never been
>easier. . .
>Also, eventually, TI-CHAT could be modified. . .
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 6:42 PM
>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>
>
>>
>>>Speaking of keyboards, can you tell me how to hook one up?
>>
>>Take the cord and plug it in your computer
>>
>>Also, is there
>>>any word-processing program that will work with it (I want to scare the
>crap
>>>out of all my friends who think that I have taken this calculator thing
>way
>>>too far).
>>
>>MS word 97...
>>
>>If so, e-mail me the schematics and 86 program (or 85, I have an
>>>emulator).  Thanks a lot.
>>
>>Oh you mean on a calc!  :]
>>
>>I've programmed an AVR to use the free keyboards at ComputerCity...  :)
>>
>>It isn't calc specific since it outputs TI protocall...when ever a key is
>>pressed.
>>
>>There aren't any apps for it yet since everyone in the hardware group knows
>>hardware but not ASM (well) and everyone in the asm groups thinks the
>>hardware group is insane...  :)
>>
>>I'm working on a program that accepts input, stores it as a string so you
>>can use it in basic.  I could wip up a program that uses 86 VAT to do the
>>same, but you'd have to test it since my 86 is out of batteries...
>>
>>
>>>                                                    -Robert Brack
>>>                                                    reb@netride.com
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Grant Stockly <gussie@alaska.net>
>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 4:27 PM
>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>your right.  If I was the only person that used my calc, added a keyboard
>>>>and used my 9 inch LCD, the 85 would be the best PC.  Also, PC is
>personal
>>>>comptuer and a mac is a personal computer.
>>>>
>>>>>Excuse me, platform.
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: ryan pogge <ryanpogge@hotmail.com>
>>>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 11:12 AM
>>>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>you aperently dont know what an OS even is....  since when is "PC" an
>>>>>>OS?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's ok, we KNOW the superior OS, PC of course!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: Robert Cicconetti <zarquon@mdo.net>
>>>>>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 9:50 AM
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Please, take it to e-mail;  the last thing this list needs is another
>>>>>>PC/=
>>>>>>>MAC
>>>>>>>flame war.. Too bad about the Newtons, though..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: MangoMan43 <MangoMan43@aol.com>
>>>>>>>To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org <ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org>
>>>>>>>Date: Sunday, March 01, 1998 12:03 PM
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: TI-H: random email
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In a message dated 98-03-01 09:15:50 EST, you write:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><<
>>>>>>>> It=B4s the reason you aren=B4t lumbered with stone-age command-line
>>>>>>int=
>>>>>>>erfaces
>>>>>>>> as your only OS option, buddy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> P.S. The 750 chip is 12.8% faster than an equivalent Pentium II
>chip,
>>>>>>a=
>>>>>>>nd
>>>>>>>> stuff your alpha arguments right back up where they came from. >>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think its kinda funny that on the newest breed of Mac's, Windows
>>>>>>will =
>>>>>>>run
>>>>>>>>better on that machine, then on a PC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Just my .02
>>>>>>>>Dave
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>______________________________________________________
>>>>>>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>