Re: TI-H: Power PC
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: Power PC
yeah right. UltraDMA runs at 33mbits MAX. I can get a constant 40MBit and
80MBit burst with Ultra Wide SCSI... Of course, it matters on the
platform... ;)
>UDMA is about as fast(or faster) then SCSI
>
>joe
>
>Adam Johnson wrote:
>
>> Oh, NO! A Mac PC war. Here's my 2 cents....
>>
>> Each bring it a specific 'better' portion to the table. Macs have
>>built-in
>> SCSI and it has allways been that way. They realised that SCSI was better,
>> faster, but harder to use, and decided speed benefits outweighed the
>>diffaculty.
>> IBM's on the other hand, wanted simplistic hardware so anyone, pretty much,
>> could get inside their computer and fiddle with it. That is why DOS was
>>so hard
>> to use. You can't have hardware and software simple at the same time, the
>> computer will melt down, and the software will crash a lot. (Hence, Win95/98
>> making its interface more simple, causes it to crash a lot. ; ) )
>>Anyway, the
>> main idea is:
>>
>> Mac: Easy to use SOFTWARE, pain in the butt HARDWARE.
>> IBM: Pain in the ass SOFTWARE, easy (For MOST people) to change HARDWARE.
>>
>> (NOTE: Sometimes, the hardware wasn't very easy, this was because people are
>> stupid. It really is simple, they used Mac software, and thought, 'Hey!
>>If our
>> hardware was like THIS, we could take over the world!' Obivously they were
>> wrong. What really happens is, it creates a confilict, which the average NEW
>> user is too stupid to fix, so they call an advanced users. Pay them lots of
>> money, and they fix it, while telling the other person what they just did.
>> (which the other person has no clue what they said.) )
>>
>> Adam
Follow-Ups:
References: