Re: TI-H: 2D Graphics routines in BASIC using matricies


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-H: 2D Graphics routines in BASIC using matricies




>> But that's only because the momo EII designers don't know how to use
>> the linkport right :).
>
>I'll let that one go, Mel, because there are bigger
>fish to fry. There isn't exactly any list ettiquete
>here, despite the efforts of Bryan Rabeler, so
>at the very least your inappropriate comments fit
>right in. :-\

Heh, "inappropriate" my ass :).

>> Even the ESF gets 5kbytes/sec easily (~40kbps).  At the time I
>> estimated a max theoretical xfer rate of around 10 to 15 kbytes/sec on
>> the TI-85.  With an AVR such rates are *definitely* possible (if not
>> higher), given that you create your own protocol (like I told bryan he
>> should have).  Using the TI protocol sux if you want xfer rate.
>
>Uhh, I think the original poster misunderstood my specs. The E2
>DOES get ~4.8kbytes/sec, at least on the 92. I expect rates are
>as high on the TI-85 and TI-86, if not higher. I assumed that
>the accepted standard is to use k or kb for kbytes and kB or kbits
>for kilobits. In the future I will try to be more clear.
>
>There is nothing wrong with the TI protocol; indeed, it is the
>only way to build an expander that will work with all of
>the current TI graphing calculators. Why not use the link
>port the way it was designed?
>
>Once again I think you are missing the entire point of the
>E2; 


Uhh no, my post was merely to mention the fact that the linkport is
being used merely to less than 25% of its total capacity (you are NOT
gonna get 4.8kbytes/sec on the 85/86).  I could care less about 3d or
whatever the hell this post is about.

-Mel


Follow-Ups: References: