Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC prog


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs o




---Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us> wrote:
>
> 
> TGaArdvark@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > > How about having several categories to rate the programs by? 
have a
> > > compactness of the programming (if the author did everything
using the
> > > least amount of code possible), the usefulness of a program
(could be
> > > how fun a game is), and some other category.
> > >
> > > Instead of having a 4/5 star system, use a 3 star.  It would be a
> > > yes/no/sorta system if the author did whatever the criteria are.
> >
> > You can only fit so much in 640 pixels.  And that just means more
> > work.  I agree that this would be the best system if it were not so
> > much more work than the others.  3 stars is a smart idea.  Maybe
> > some other picture might be better though so people will expect
> > 3 instead of 4 or 5.  Maybe thumbs up or something... Dunno.
> 
> That's true, we are getting a little cramped for space after we
added the
> date column.  But I think we still have room, since the filename and
size
> columns seem to be very far apart.
> 
> --
> Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>    File Archives, HTML, and Support
>    the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> 
> 
> 

as long as you are changing the archives, how about grouping files
according to type?  Why not put those 10 minesweepers right next to
one another so that they can be compared.  I know that alphabetical
order is the best way to have it, but if things are grouped in
categories it is easier.
==
Garth Johnson
Please email me at garthjohnson@bigfoot.com
 or brandtly@hotmail.com for large files

Visit my website!
http://www.bigfoot.com/~garthjohnson

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


Follow-Ups: