Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC prog


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs on ticalc.org





---jroush <jroush@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> 
> ----------
> > From: The Garth Johnson <gbjohnson@yahoo.com>
> > To: ti-basic@lists.ticalc.org
> > Subject: Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good
> TI-BASIC programs on ticalc.org
> > Date: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 9:14 AM
> > 
> > 
> > ---Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Matthew wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This might be a bit labor intensive, but how about creating a
second
> > > > directory tree for the good ones.  Every one gets posted in one,
> > and the
> > > > good programs get put in both.
> > > >
> > > > Just a thought,
> > > > Matthew
> > > 
> > > Too much work, I like the 4 (or 5) star rating system better.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > >    File Archives, HTML, and Support
> > >    the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > How about having several categories to rate the programs by?  have a
> > compactness of the programming (if the author did everything using
the
> > least amount of code possible), the usefulness of a program (could
be
> > how fun a game is), and some other category.
> > 
> > Instead of having a 4/5 star system, use a 3 star.  It would be a
> > yes/no/sorta system if the author did whatever the criteria are.
> > ==
> > Garth Johnson
> > Please email me at garthjohnson@bigfoot.com
> >  or brandtly@hotmail.com for large files
> > 
> > Visit my website!
> > http://www.bigfoot.com/~garthjohnson
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________
> > DO YOU YAHOO!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > 
> 
> ok, look, this is my 2 cents:
> lets say you have progs A, B, and C.
> A has the most features.
> B has fewer features, but some that A doesn't
> C looks like a personalized copy of B
> what do you keep ??
> A and B, you don't need C  is that simple enough for everyone?
> 

but what if C (which is a copy of B) has some stuff simplified?  What
if the author rewrote some things to make the prog smaller?  then what
do you do?  (I have done this--download programs and rewrite them, but
I wouldn't ever upload them to ticalc.org unless I added something
signifigant.)
==
Garth Johnson
Please email me at garthjohnson@bigfoot.com
 or brandtly@hotmail.com for large files

Visit my website!
http://www.bigfoot.com/~garthjohnson

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com