Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC prog
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TIB: Re: RE: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs on ticalc.org
The Garth Johnson wrote:
> ---Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@isd.ingham.k12.mi.us> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Matthew wrote:
> >
> > > This might be a bit labor intensive, but how about creating a second
> > > directory tree for the good ones. Every one gets posted in one,
> and the
> > > good programs get put in both.
> > >
> > > Just a thought,
> > > Matthew
> >
> > Too much work, I like the 4 (or 5) star rating system better.
> >
> > --
> > Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> > File Archives, HTML, and Support
> > the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> >
> >
> >
>
> How about having several categories to rate the programs by? have a
> compactness of the programming (if the author did everything using the
> least amount of code possible), the usefulness of a program (could be
> how fun a game is), and some other category.
>
> Instead of having a 4/5 star system, use a 3 star. It would be a
> yes/no/sorta system if the author did whatever the criteria are.
> ==
> Garth Johnson
> Please email me at garthjohnson@bigfoot.com
> or brandtly@hotmail.com for large files
>
> Visit my website!
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~garthjohnson
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Well, thats basically what the entire review system was supposed to do. I
was thinking of just having one rating per file, and probably being a 4-star
system.
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, HTML, and Support
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
References: