Re: TIB: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs on
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TIB: Proposal: To weed out useless and no good TI-BASIC programs on tical...
TGaArdvark@aol.com wrote:
> > I've been thinking about not accepting & archiving ALL basic programs on
> > ticalc.org. I hate having like 10 minesweepers for 82 basic or
> > whatever. Or 10 quadratic formula programs for 82 basic. I think there
> > should only be one or two good ones so that the user can quickly get a
> > program and know its good, instead of having to weed through 10 of
> > them. So my proposal is to delete some of the not-very useful programs
> > in order to prevent the archives from being diluted with worthless
> > programs. What do you all think?
>
> I do agree. The TI community has grown large enough that programs
> should start "earning" their way to ticalc.org. The problem is, checking
> all those programs and deciding which one or two is best is very time-
> consuming. And you'd have to continue testing new ones as they are
> submitted. A lot of work. Especially for one person...
I already try to test all the programs that come in. I don't do a very
in-depth test though - which would be required for these BASIC programs.
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, HTML, and Support
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
References: