Re: Fwd: TI SUCKS!!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Fwd: TI SUCKS!!
Actually 10. 2 are retired. :)
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, News, Features, and HTML
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Ben Moss wrote:
> I would like to point out that www.hpcalc.org is maintained by just ONE
> person, while www.ticalc.org is maintained by a WHOLE STAFF (12 people). I
> could see how one site could easily get more hits than another. It isn't
> popularity that determines one thing better than another.
> -Ben Moss
> p.s. Although I do like HP calculators best, I'm not trying to "prove"
> hp's better than ti's or anything; I just wanted to point out an error in
> philosophy (in my opinion).
>
>
> At 05:33 PM 1/19/99 EST, you wrote:
> >
> >From: Jeanne9005@aol.com
> >Return-path: <Jeanne9005@aol.com>
> >To: TI_Bomberman@YAHOO.COM
> >Subject: Re: TI SUCKS!!
> >Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 17:30:46 EST
> >Mime-Version: 1.0
> >Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
> >
> >OK, lets try this. The HP is faster and much better at many things than the
> >TI's. But you all keep bitchin that "Oh, the HP's processor is 8 years
> >old...." Blah, the z80 is over 25 years old. So what?!? They are both good
> >in their own respects. Think of it this way. The HP is loved by millions,
> >right? The TI's are loved by millions, right? The way to settle this is to
> >look at the number of hits on the respectful .org homepages, those being
> >hpcalc.org and ticalc.org. Unless I'm severly mistaken, there are more hits
> >on ticalc.org every week than hpcalc.org has had since they started. TI
> >FOREVER!!!
> >
> >
> >In a message dated 1/19/99 5:09:00 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> >TI_Bomberman@YAHOO.COM writes:
> >
> >> TI SUCKS!! HP RULES!!!!!!
> >
> ===
> /////////////////////////////////
> // Ben Moss, KC0DOD //
> // benm@rollanet.org //
> // www.rollanet.org/~benm //
> /////////////////////////////////
>
References: