Re: BASIC > ASM

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: BASIC > ASM
From: sasquacht@HOTMAIL.COM
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 17:00:29 GMT
Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
References: <QMOS2.13934$Zz2.725@news.rdc1.az.home.com> <371C495A.5C9B063A@cern.ch>
Reply-To: sasquacht@HOTMAIL.COM
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:28785

Interesting !
It seems that you have a big knowledge on the subject.
I would really like to know your opinion about the speed of the HP48 RPL
 despite its C.P.U 8 times less powerful than the m68K of the TI92+.
Also do you know why bthe For loop of the TI92+ is much slower in approx mode
than in AUTO mode.
And to finish:
You can lock edit a program by editing it with the TI graph Link.


       Thanks to answer.



-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************

Follow-Ups:

Re: BASIC > ASM

From: Laurent Deniau <Laurent.Deniau@CERN.CH>

References:

From:

Re: BASIC > ASM

From: Laurent Deniau <Laurent.Deniau@CERN.CH>