Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89
From: Wesley <moore.w@HOTKEY.NET.AU>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 20:27:56 +1000
Cache-Post-Path: woody.hotkey.net.au!unknown@sunb-dial1-50.vic.hotkey.net.au
Organization: Hotkey Internet Services Pty Ltd
References: <37124ee4.284522@news.northcoast.com> <19990413000658.08979.00002267@ng07.aol.com>
Reply-To: Wesley <moore.w@HOTKEY.NET.AU>
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:28639

> >I think I like the ti's better, to calculate the same integral, I just
> >type int(e^x,x,0,1) where int is the integral symbol.
>
> Well, the HP gives you that option, but what if you forget whether the
limits
> go before or after the variable?  if the variable of integration goes
before or
> after the integrand?  Instead of memorizing some arbitrary order, you can
write
> it in your calc just as you would on paper.

The 89's CATALOGUE function gives syntax for every command.

******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************

References:

Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

From: Mike Hunt <MikeHuntTROUSERS@MAILROOM.COM>

Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89

From: Jemfinch02 <jemfinch02@AOL.COM>