Re: TI-89?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: TI-89?



Scott Noveck (SMN) wrote:

> It's NOT backwards compatible -- it's a scaled down handheld version of the
> 92
> And no, this is actually a good idea (It'll be SAT-allowed), but the 73
> sounds dumb. . .

You _can_ transfer anything from the 89 to the 92 Plus _and_ vice-versa.  You
can also send limited things from the 89 to the 92 and vice-verse.

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/


References: