Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Why Ti 80 etc. ?
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ISD.INGHAM.K12.MI.US>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 21:32:03 -0500
References: <1akCBBAuovD1EwCe@cyrax.demon.co.uk>
Reply-To: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ISD.INGHAM.K12.MI.US>

Pyromaniac wrote:

> Why are the calculators called 80,82 etc? Also why is the the 73 called
> that when it seems considerably better than the 80, so why is the number
> lower?
> --Michael

They've already used the numbers 80, 81, 82, and 83.  They can't call it an
84 because that would make it better than the 83, which it isn't.

--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

References:

Why Ti 80 etc. ?

From: Pyromaniac <Michael@CYRAX.DEMON.CO.UK>

Prev: Why Ti 80 etc. ?
Next: official '89 processor
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread