Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate
From: Brad Barger <brbarger@SILVERSTAR.COM>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1998 20:33:12 PDT
In-Reply-To: <6r478i$sj5$1@news.campus.mci.net>
Priority: Normal
References: Conversation <mw20247xg@germanynet.de> with last message <6r478i$sj5$1@news.campus.mci.net>
Reply-To: Brad Barger <brbarger@SILVERSTAR.COM>

>Hi,
>>
>>
>does anybody know why TI produced so many calcs
>the last years in relation to HP? Is HP sleeping? Why
>can one company think its worth the research and
>development for a new calc nowadays and the other
>big calc company seems to think, well, no market for
>calcs these days?
>>
>>
>Any opinions, comments, statements?
>>
>>
>Thanks,
>Stefan.

Just thought I would post the orginal message. It seems things have strayed a little from the orignal thought. The question was why hasn't HP produced a calculator for so long. The question said nothing about one calculator being better..

Thanx for letting me use your ears or at least your eyes for a second,
Brad

Follow-Ups:

Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate

From: James <slimjimmy@USA.NET>

References:

Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate

From: Raymond Hellstern <101.165571@GERMANYNET.DE>

Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate

From: Larry Elmore <ljelmore@MONTANA.CAMPUS.MCI.NET>

Prev: Re: Ti-85 Programs
Next: Re: HP's and TI's calculator output rate
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread