Re: What the heck?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: What the heck?



On 3 Dec 1996 02:06:03 GMT, damienden@aol.com wrote:


>Oh, and points for antirush (the*guy*without*a*real*address); I agree: The
>responses to the post didn't have to be at all graphic or explicit,
>especially with the point you're trying to get across.

I have a *real* email address, try and see...


Follow-Ups: References: