Re: LF: ***** Greyscale experts...READ THIS NOW (PLEASE) ******

Re: LF: ***** Greyscale experts...READ THIS NOW (PLEASE) ******

• To: list-fargo@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: LF: ***** Greyscale experts...READ THIS NOW (PLEASE) ******
• From: Jonas Minnberg <md94-jmi@nada.kth.se>
• Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 15:56:43 +0100 (MET)
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.95.961206115303.14763C-100000@fakse.dit.ou.dk>
• Reply-To: list-fargo@lists.ticalc.org

On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Michael Wulff Nielsen wrote:

> 
> Yeah, but even 3 pictures in greyscale should not take 30k of ram.
> it goes like this:
> 
> On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, Eric Gross wrote: 
> (240Witdh/8Pixels/Byte)*128*3=23040 bytes.
> And that is the worst case. Then there is some code. But if there is more
> 1 k I`ll be suprised. 

The pic is 240x512 - 30*512*2 = 30k. Simple, eh? I think it's time we ended
this dicussion soon, it's not doing much good...

//Sasq (Jonas Minnberg)

> > 
> > That pis is 30k because you can scroll down. It has the equivalent amount of
> > 3 pics.
> > 
> 
> 

• Re: LF: ***** Greyscale experts...READ THIS NOW (PLEASE) ******
• From: Michael Wulff Nielsen <mal@dit.ou.dk>

• Prev: RE: LF: Communal Library (for lack of a better name)
• Next: Re: LF: Communal Library (for lack of a better name)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread