Re: A89: kernel/no stub

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A89: kernel/no stub
From: "Jeremie Knusel" <elendur@freesurf.ch>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 02:55:52 +0200
References: <a6.8829532.26c9b3a2@aol.com> <a6.8829532.26c9b3a2@aol.com> <4.3.2.7.0.20000814185214.00abdaa0@pop3.ti-files.org> <001501c00647$9eec39e0$58721118@stche1.la.home.com> <005b01c0064b$92d60fb0$0100a8c0@gandalf> <20000815015147.C23270@m101.ryd.student.liu.se>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


thanks :)
I've just to go and look at some documentation now :)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Johan" <johei804@student.liu.se>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: A89: kernel/no stub


>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 01:58:40AM +0200, Jeremie Knusel wrote:
> >
> > where does the kernel put his code to be sure that it won't be erased or
> > relocated?
>
> In a locked memory block.
>
>
> /Johan  "100 bytes is enough."
>

References:

Re: A89: kernel/no stub

From: S43R80@aol.com

Re: A89: kernel/no stub

From: Rob Smith <kormoc@ti-files.org>

Re: A89: kernel/no stub

From: "Matthew Landry" <mhlandry1@home.com>

Re: A89: kernel/no stub

From: "Jeremie Knusel" <elendur@freesurf.ch>

Re: A89: kernel/no stub

From: Johan <johei804@student.liu.se>