Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries




The reason you think HW2 is bad is because none of the current
games/progarms work on it.  But the fact is, after AMS 2.00 and the SDK come
out, people will be able to write games for the new ROM/HW2, and then the
tables will be turned.

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


>
> Oh well that's no worries man. The changes they made are on the negative
> side. I mean if 20% more speed at the sacrafice of stability for current
> games and the ability to have greyscale (which a lot of games require)
> well.. I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to work out something with Ti to get a
> new one. I bet they would do it for you for free if you had a good reason
> like... My calc is 20% slower than you advertised it'd never ever be =P
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
>
>
> >
> > Yeah.  I was here before Assembly-89 AND Assembly-92 were created. :)
> >
> > The thing I have against HW1 is that TI has done this somewhat unfairly.
> > They made the TI-89 have Flash ROM so users wouldn't have to worry about
> > buying an out-of-date calculator, they can just flash the ROM.  Then
they
> go
> > and change the stuff that can't be updated via the ROM.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:25 PM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
> >
> >
>
>
>
>



References: