Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries




Yeah.  I was here before Assembly-89 AND Assembly-92 were created. :)

The thing I have against HW1 is that TI has done this somewhat unfairly.
They made the TI-89 have Flash ROM so users wouldn't have to worry about
buying an out-of-date calculator, they can just flash the ROM.  Then they go
and change the stuff that can't be updated via the ROM.

Bryan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries


>
> Dood. Um. K. So you were here before the list started?
> I got here WHEN it started =P Mr. Defensive j00 are. Like
> whatcha got against hw1 anyway. It sounds like your happy
> that it's going to become less popular and the new followers
> will have substandart calculators. Come to think of it I'm rather
> happy on this note too although I dont have much use for my calc
> anymore since I now have no math classes. Oh well. To each his own.
> -Serial
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bryan Rabeler <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 7:51 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
>
>
> >
> > If you want to talk about who's been here longer, I was here before
Fargo
> > was released.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Serial" <Serial@earthlink.net>
> > To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, November 21, 1999 2:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: A89: Re: Fw: TI-89 ROM 1.05 vs 2.00 version inquiries
> >
> >
>
>
>



Follow-Ups: References: