Re: A89: Re: Archive memory
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Re: Archive memory
By the way, why can't libraries be placed in archive memory? Libraries don't
need to be written to do they?
Bryan Rabeler wrote:
> AFAIK, unlike the normal memory, archive memory is read-only. And you can't
> put libraries or external levels in archive memory either.
>
> Bryan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Filipe Soares Pinto <filipepinto@mail.telepac.pt>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 1999 1:13 PM
> Subject: A89: Archive memory
>
> >
> > I understand that this isn't 'assembly', but i just bought my ti-89
> > yesterday, and (having i had a ti-86) it is very different from my old
> one.
> > I don't understand if there are any disadvantages in using the archive
> > memory, instead of the archive memory. The archive memory, i have already
> > realised, causes a lot of trashing, i think, but other than that (which i
> > haven't understood very well also) it seems pretty much the same.
> > NEvertheless, the author of street fighter says in the txt file, that he
> > advises that the program should be in the ram memory in order to save
> > batteries. Can someone help me with this?
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> > P.s. I'm just a newbie with the ti-89
> >
> >
> >
> >
Follow-Ups:
References: