A89: lea vs. add.l

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A89: lea vs. add.l
From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 07:43:02 +0100
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
References: <db8ac579.36d227ab@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org

here:

lea	 8 clock   4 bytes(?)
move.l  10 clock   6 bytes(?)

I'm not shure about the lengths, but the times are correct.
as for the lengths I was thinking, for lea 2byte instruction + 2byte
displacement. and for move.l 2byte instruction + 4bytes of immidiate data.

//Olle

S43R80@aol.com wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 99-02-22 22:50:04 EST, you write:
>      First a word is pushed then a longword  then two words are
> pushed//2+4+2+2=10 so you have to add 10 to the stack...you could also do it
> the other way: lea 10(a7),a7 which i think is like 1 byte shorter or something

References:

Re: A89: Re: Stupid Question

From: S43R80@aol.com

Prev: Re: A89: Re: Stupid Question
Next: A89: Left goes up and right goes down
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread