RE: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM
Ok, lets see here. Might I remind you that the C programs would run
noticably slower then those in pure asm =) I think that C is great and all
but normally C programs are more bloated and slow then asm proggies. I
doubt SMQ would even be possible (at its speed) in C =)
-}InFuZeD{
On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Jeff Tyrrill wrote:
>
> Maybe not yet, but when TI's SDK for the 89 and 92+ are released, nobody
> will use ASM anymore (unless they charge for the SDK), because it will make
> it really easy to use C. Also, 89 and 92+ are very compatible, even with ASM
> (right?), but especially with C, so one list would probably work for both
> calcs.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Miles Raymond
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 10:41 PM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM
>
>
>
> Do you think ticalc.org should make a C89 list? That might not be such a
> bad idea...
>
> C-89@lists.ticalc.org
>
> Because now it is a possibility, and it certainly doesn't fit in the
> existing categories:
>
> tibasic@lists.ticalc.org
> assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
>
> And they might as well make a 92+ equivalent then also...
>
> C-92@lists.ticalc.org
>
> -Miles Raymond EML: m_rayman@bigfoot.com
> ICQ: 13217756 IRC: Killer2 AIM: KilIer2 (kilier2)
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~m_rayman/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <BLoWh0Le@aol.com>
> To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 6:37 PM
> Subject: Re: A89: Re: "Transfer" of values between C and ASM
>
>
> > since when did this list suddenly turn into the C89 list? ;-)
> > oh well, at least it's better than the Linux89 list.
>
>
>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: