Re: A89: Shell compatibility

To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A89: Shell compatibility
From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 05:01:42 +0200 (MET DST)
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <5b1f44ae.360da9f0@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


Right.  That is why we need one shell that everyone will accept.  See why
shell-specific programs suck?

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, Newsletter, and HTML
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Sat, 26 Sep 1998 TurboSoft@aol.com wrote:

> 
> In a message dated 9/26/98 10:52:51 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> brabeler@ticalc.org writes:
> 
> > Right, but running PlusShell programs with Doors installed is dumb and
> >  pointless.
> but you have to unless the same program is for doors.  Doors is simply a way
> to make programs smaller if the program is available like that.
>

References:

Re: A89: Shell compatibility

From: TurboSoft@aol.com

Prev: Re: A89: Virus Scanner for the 89
Next: Re: A89: Virus Scanner for the 89
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread