RE: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply

To: <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: RE: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
From: "Dennis Ng" <onpaws@geocities.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 19:14:45 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-89-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <00cc01be16a2$afdf1ba0$ad46fea9@eddie>
Reply-To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org


the z80 isn't even 8-bit, it's 16-bit
but the 68k and the z80's structures are totally different...

i thought ppl knew that...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Miles Raymond
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 1998 12:33 AM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
> 
> 
> 
> Is that true?  I thought the M68k was 8-bit like the Z80.
> 
> -Miles Raymond
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Ng <onpaws@geocities.com>
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Sunday, November 22, 1998 1:44 PM
> Subject: RE: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
> 
> 
> >It's 32=bit!
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> >> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Nathan Mueller
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:18 AM
> >> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> >> Subject: Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply
> >> 
> >> >And about making a 64-bit game on a 8(I think)-bit system
> >> 
> >> Is the 68k 8-bit?  I thought it was 16
> >> 
> >> --Nate
>

References:

Re: A89: Fw: StarFox -Reply

From: "Miles Raymond" <m_rayman@bigfoot.com>

Prev: Re: A89: Original Mario
Next: RE: A89: Re: Maybe some math programs?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread