RE: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
haha, i told u multiple libraries were good. let's try maybe detaching from
an OS...
personally, i think plusShell and DoorsOS are pretty much useless. They
would be better off as Operating Environments, just as in the ti-86. We
already know that it's not even necessary to have either! and libraries can
even be called without them! so how about everybody compiling without either
OSs in consideration?
PS, correct me if i'm wrong.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of EaglePrj@aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 1998 1:18 AM
> To: assembly-89@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
>
>
>
> In a message dated 11/11/98 10:54:29 PM Eastern Standard Time, justin-
> b@juno.com writes:
>
> > The idea of a common bank of functions, not necessarily a library, is
> > definitely memory efficient and helpful to programmers. But
> rather than
> > creating a myriad of libraries, why not append the most useful and most
> > used functions directly to the operating system? This way, no separate
> > files are needed and thus the hassle of managing a collection of
> > libraries is ridden.
>
> If you incorporate the libraries into the os, you are forced to
> use an os to
> run the assembly programs.
>
> ~Chris
>
References: