Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A89: Survey for the next version of PlusShell
>I think that libraries are a good idea. When more assembly programs
>are
>produced, if none of the programs use libraries, we will be able to
>store less
>programs on the 89 than if we did use libraries. Besides, if a
>library is
>used, than each program will only need a few bytes to implement a
>routine,
>instead of the whole routine in each program. Now that a standard for
>libraries has been developed between Plushell and DoorsOS, there will
>soon be
>no more incompatibility problems.
The idea of a common bank of functions, not necessarily a library, is
definitely memory efficient and helpful to programmers. But rather than
creating a myriad of libraries, why not append the most useful and most
used functions directly to the operating system? This way, no separate
files are needed and thus the hassle of managing a collection of
libraries is ridden.
Justin Bosch
justin-b@juno.com
___________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Follow-Ups:
References: