Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]

Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: Cassady Roop <croop@oregontrail.net>
• Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 16:19:18 -0800
• References: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0011091104540.1206-100000@apocalypse.OCF.Berkeley.EDU> <p04320401b6321d69e059@[209.245.165.199]>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

> on RAM page 0 space for Asm programs, and the fact that the z80 has
> only two registers with which to do math

Only two registers?  Perhaps it has been a while since doing any 86
programming, but I could swear I use a lot more than two registers in my
programs...

> and an extremely poor
> instruction set compared to the 68k 

I love the z80 instruction set!  (of course, it's also the only one that
makes any sense to me...)  68k looks like it was invented by a demon.


Cassady Roop

• Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: Adam Thayer <krevinek@yahoo.com>

• Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: Patrick Davidson <pad@OCF.Berkeley.EDU>
• Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• From: Adam Thayer <krevinek@yahoo.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: What C-compilers have we got? [82/83/83+/85/86]
• Next: Re: A86: Assembly Studio 8x released
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread