Re: A86: brian, quit it!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: brian, quit it!
Well, you should be happy, they are heading in that direction right now. :)
Bryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Akshay Dhalwala" <akdjr@softhome.net>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: A86: brian, quit it!
>
> now this is the way ticalc.org should be... =)
>
> akshay
> http://akdjr.8m.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bryan Rabeler" <rabelerb@pilot.msu.edu>
> To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 12:14 PM
> Subject: Re: A86: brian, quit it!
>
>
> >
> > Ok, I'll work on something...
> >
> > But did you take a look at Kirk's parody of ticalc.org? It can be found
> here:
> > http://www.mines.edu/students/k/kmeyer/ticalc.org/ It's quite funny I
> must say.
> > :) Although one improvement I would make is take the "It sucks." option
> off the
> > survey and just leave the first option by itself.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <RoniBarrett@aol.com>
> > To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 1:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: A86: brian, quit it!
> >
> >
> > >
> > > You know what id like to see? A website that fully outlines the alleged
> > > transgressions of ticalc, and gives them a chance to defend themselves.
> I
> > > dont question Bryan at all, its just that I havnt seen much hard proof
> > > either...
> > >
> > > Jeff Barrett
> > >
> > > In a message dated 1/13/2000 8:04:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > > malcolmj1@juno.com writes:
> > >
> > > << you just keep ranting and raving at how bad www.ticalc.org is. you're
> not
> > > putting up much proof that i've seen (i believe you though). i think
> it's
> > > run similiar to the way russia was over organized by their communistic
> > > efforts: the coordinators, who "rule" and control every aspect of the
> > > www.ticalc.org beaurocracy with an authoritarian view of obedience,
> claim
> > > to be bettering the ti calculator industry. the only flaw in your
> > > communist argument is that they are not claiming to share goods and
> > > services equally. i have seen no where on www.ticalc.org that "everyone
> > > has access to everything...take what you need and give your all". no
> > > where! they don't meet the definition of communism. they don't even
> meet
> > > russia's perverted view of marxist-leninist because they don't advocate
> > > the overthrow of any capitalistic efforts. there isn't even a
> proletariat
> > > to overthrow!
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
References: