Re: A86: Re: Re: Re: freeservers web space [ot]
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Re: Re: Re: freeservers web space [ot]
To mention another, tragic flaw in the nature of ticalc.org - they have just
revoked my comment posting privileges and voting privileges indefinitely,
and they won't even tell me why. The simply, as always, cite the word
"abuse" as the problem. I really don't get this, I haven't posted a comment
in a couple days now... oh well.
Bryan
"I personally guarantee that there will be no 'censorship' of what he [Bryan
Rabeler] writes (as long as he keepts to the rules about such things as
language used)." - Magnus Hagander, 5 March 1999
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Kam" <bryan_kam@usa.net>
To: <assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 1999 2:11 AM
Subject: RE: A86: Re: Re: Re: freeservers web space [ot]
>
> Plenty of people do seem to want to flame Bryan, and I do see why. They
see
> Bryan as a negative person who speaks too critically about ticalc.org;
they
> do not know the full story of ticalc.org and naively believe it to be the
> best it could possibly be. Because they see ticalc.org as a utopian
> calculator paradise, they see Bryan as bringing out the worst in the site.
>
> Bryan Kam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:owner-assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org] On Behalf Of
TGaArdvark@aol.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 10:42 PM
> To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: Re: A86: Re: Re: Re: freeservers web space [ot]
>
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't think you wield quite enough authority to
> tell Bryan not to post to the lists. If you wish to flame Bryan
> (and plenty of people seem to have this wish, though I fail to
> see exactly why), flame to him PERSONALLY, not to the
> lists. You tell Bryan not to post to the list, what makes you
> so mighty that you can post your flames to the list? I send
> this to the lists because there's like two dozen people on
> here with this problem. That and I could care less whether
> or not this list is on-topic or not or whether I get one or one
> million letters a day from it. If anyone wishes to flame me
> for this letter, please reply to the list so that I can humiliate
> you in public.
>
> In a message dated 12/23/99 9:10:35 AM US Mountain Standard Time,
> arcadesdude@hotmail.com writes:
>
> > WHO CARES!!! Stop being spiteful on little things. This is a
mailing
> > list for people who program in 86 asm and not for your little
> 'nit-picking'.
> >
> > If this disposition stems from your hatred of ticalc then go THERE,
do
> > something that HAS an effect, not just act bitter and
'obivousnessless'.
> > Sure your lessen things with a smiley at the end of your posts, but it
is
> > still pointless. Please do not reply to theses posts (anywhere) unless
> you
> > have something constuctive to say.
> >
> > Destuction goes nowhere, construction goes everywhere. If you were
> to
> > start critizing ticalc (in any way, a critisim is just an opinion) then
> you
> > may actually get somewhere in your 'anti-communist crusade'.
> >
> > That is all i have to say on the matter. If you wish to reply
> please
> > use my email instead of replying to this post.
>
>
>
References: