Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation

Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation

• To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation
• From: Grams Family <grams@netcarrier.com>
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 06:04:31
• Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <3515DA7F.CA873092@erols.com>
• References: <004101bd5563$ef76b760$3d4103cf@joemama.minot> <351572DB.C0D0F089@digicron.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org

At 10:43 PM 3/22/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Adler wrote:
>
>> perhaps i didn't mention i'm on a 68k mac (for those of you who know
what im
>> talking about) not a power pc. all the emulators require a ppc processor.
>
>this is probably a stupid question but would that mean the same 68k that
is in the
>ti-92
>
>Patrick
>
Yeah, basically. It isn't (probably) exactly the same one, but it's pretty
similar. There are four processors in the 68K family, the 68000, 68020,
68030, and 68040 (plus some variants). It's just like the intel processors,
each chip is faster and/or has more instructions.

--Joshua

• Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation
• From: Butler Family <butler2@erols.com>

• A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation
• From: "Trey Jazz" <joemama@minot.com>
• Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation
• From: Adler <adler@digicron.com>
• Re: A86: Re: Re: Assembly Studio Documentation
• From: Butler Family <butler2@erols.com>

• Prev: Re: A86: Linking
• Next: Re: A86: Re: rst $xx
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread