Re: A86: 86 interrupts?

To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A86: 86 interrupts?
From: Joshua Grams <j3grams@earthling.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 15:12:57
Delivered-To: assembly-86-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <35A266B1.F8A2EFAC@eden.rutgers.edu>
References: <8ed37936.35a1de98@aol.com>
Reply-To: assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org


At 12:19 PM 7/7/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>>  Second, you may be right about it being
>> _getkey.  I truthfully have no clue what routine it is.  But if
>> it is _getkey, then _getkey happens to be the linkport
>> interrupt he was looking for.  I didn't say there was a
>> separate linkport interrupt.  I just said there was one.
>
>Not quite, disabling interrupts doesn't disable _getkey.  In an asm prog,
>_getkey isn't called unless you call it._getkey is a call, not an interrupt.
>
But disabling interrupts would stop _getkey being called unless you called
it in your program, wouldn't it? In that case, disabling interrupts should
fix Bryan's problem. Along with not calling _getkey while using the linkport.

--Joshua

Follow-Ups:

Re: A86: 86 interrupts?

From: Bryan Rittmeyer <bryanr@flash.net>

References:

Re: A86: 86 interrupts?

From: TGaArdvark@aol.com

Re: A86: 86 interrupts?

From: Dux Gregis <assets@eden.rutgers.edu>